Tuesday, March 27, 2012

Mini Session Reflection

All I have to say about class today is…lucky me!!!  I am not trying to be sarcastic; I’m really happy that the wait is over and I have a mock session with Mike under my belt.  I feel that this practice scenario will help make future sessions easier, and I have certainly, “eaten the frog first” (Shout out to Mike’s comment on my blog).  As happy as I am that I’ve had such an experience, there are definitely aspects of the session to reflect on.
 Before I get into the nitty-gritty aspects of my performance, I have to share that I was not anywhere near as nervous as I normally would be!!! Praise God!! Usually when I’m called in front of the class, or placed in the center of attention, I get so nervous that it hinders my participation.  Thankfully, such was not the case. 

 Ok, back to the criticism.  I did make a conscious effort to get a lot of information about “Jeffrey’s” work before we began reading.  Thinking back to our mock sessions with the English 101 students, I was guilty of jumping into the essay before I fully understood the writer’s assignment and brief background of her ideas.  Today, however, I was aware of the need for pre-textual conversation, and thus attempted to foster such interaction.  Sadly, the conversation was still lacking.  I thought I knew enough about what Jeffrey was going to discuss in his paper, but could have never predicted the complexity of his thoughts.  I think I still need to work on getting more background information, and even ask the writer to outline what they hope is expressed in their paper. 

 Another fear I have is not grasping the writer’s ideas as well as I should.  I understand that Jeffrey’s paper was very dense, but by the time he read onto the second page, I had completely forgotten what was discussed in his introduction.  I think I would prefer to read the paper aloud, and at a slow pace.  At times, I find myself trying to find things to critique, grasp all of the writer’s ideas, and read all at the same time.  I know the multitasking is not unique to me, but I feel like each paper is still a huge challenge; my novice experience has not allowed me to jumble all of these tasks with ease.

 I think all of this will come with time, and I agree that there is no perfect session.  I don’t mind criticizing my efforts, so feel free to name any other flaws/ list suggestions.  Also, I can’t wait to work with the 101 students!!     

2 comments:

  1. Not a criticism, Kelsey, but a comment. If you ever do feel that you don't have enough information on the assignment, it's OK to restart. There's no law that says we have to keep reading once we start. If you think you'll be better served by stopping the reading and asking the writer to again explain or elaborate upon the assignment or her paper, then do so. I think some of the best sessions come from our being willing to stop and say, "wait, I need to understand this more."

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think you're absolutely right. I would much rather clarify the assignment mid-session, as opposed to not offering quality advice because I'm still confused. I think this may have triggered something to discuss in my pedagogy, thanks!

    ReplyDelete